Legal Opinion

Estudillo v. Meyerstein

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1887No. 12035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to set aside and annul the discharge from their debts, granted to the defendants in certain insolvency proceedings under the *318Insolvent Act of 1880. It is alleged in the complaint that on the seventeenth day of February, 1885, the defendants were doing business as partners, and the plaintiff had a claim against them, which was provable against their estate in insolvency; that on that day a creditors’ petition was filed against them, upon which they were, on the 6th of March, 1885, adjudged insolvents; that thereafter they applied for their discharge, and on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. . LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Tuxbury v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Williams v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Hough v. LucasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Benicia Agricultural Works v. EstesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API