Legal Opinion

In re Colwell Worsted Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The Colwell Worsted Mills is here seeking to bring itself within the provisions of the Arbitration Law, so as to obtain confirmation of an arbitration award arising out of a written submission not duly acknowledged. In so seeking, the Colwell Worsted Mills obviously fails, since the statute providing for arbitration requires “ A submission * * * shall be in writing, duly acknowledged or proved, and certified, in like manner as a deed to be recorded.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1449.) This submission was not so acknowledged. There was lacking a certificate by a proper officer of the State of Rhode…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Concrete Steel & Tile Construction Co. & GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Hellman & WolbromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. In re Resolute Paper Products Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API