Dixon v. State

This is the second appearance of this case here, and those possessed of sufficient curiosity are referred to the statement of facts as they appear on former appeal. 189 Ark. 812, 75 S. W. (2d) 242. In reference to the surrounding facts and circumstances of the killing, the testimony on this appeal is substantially the same as that presented on the former appeal, and we there said of it: ‘ ‘ There was testimony corroborating and other testimony contradicting the testimony given by Alberta, but it is unimportant to set it out, as the question of her veracity was one for the jury, and her…