Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided October 15, 1934No. 62Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stewart, P. J.,

This is a rule upon the plaintiff to show cause why a more specific statement of claim should not be filed. The question involved is well stated in defendant’s brief, as follows:

“Where two separate causes of action on two separate and independent bonds, on which the same surety appears in each, are joined in one action, must the plaintiff who seeks to recover on these bonds aver specifically the amount due on each bond or may the plaintiff lump the sum which he claims due by reason of breaches of both bonds?”

When we turn to the statement, we find that on November 4, 1932, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cameron v. FishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. M'Cahan v. HirstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Bradly v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Neil v. AbelNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Seip v. DrachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API