Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Commonwealth, Fish & Wildlife Division

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 19, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANT, Judge.

Appellant, an employee of the Fish and Wildlife Division of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, suffered an alleged injury in August, 1974. A claim for workmen’s compensation benefits was filed in July, 1977, ap-pellee resisting by special answer, on the grounds that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The timeliness of this defense was raised by the appellant, but in light of our reversal on other grounds we will not rule on that point.

It was determined by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that the employer did not comply with KRS 342.186, which statute was in effect at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carr v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Frankfort v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  2. Newberg v. HudsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Boothe v. Special FundCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  4. McGregor v. Pip Johnson Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Purdy v. PalmoreKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API