Legal Opinion

EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 30, 2019No. 1:18-cv-05880Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: nanan 22 □□ nn 222-2222 $222 □□□ === ------------ X DATE FILED: 8/30/2019 EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., : Plaintiff, : : 18 Civ. 5880 (LGS) -against- : : OPINION AND ORDER REPRO-MED SYSTEMS INC., : Defendant. : LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: Plaintiff EMED Technologies (‘EMED”’) alleges that Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (“RMS”) infringed United States Patent No. 9,808,576 (the “576 Patent’), titled “Devices and Methods for Protecting a User from a Sharp Tip of a Medical Needle.” The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API