Malcolm v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REILLY, Chief Judge:
This is a sequel to our recent decision in United States v. Malcolm, D.C.App., 331 A.2d 329 (1975). Appellant Malcolm is the same gentleman whose reported selling of marijuana to miscellaneous customers in the 2500 block of 14th Street, N.W., resulted in his arrest and the charge by in formation of a violation of D.C.Code 1973, § 33-402.
Some five weeks later, the very informant whose report caused a police officer to make the original arrest, told the same officer that he had just seen Malcolm offering similar illegal substances for sale. Behaving with seeming classic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clarence D. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Chin Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Samuel Wrightson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Luis L. Cervantes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- John F. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Pueblo v. Vázquez MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
- Guerra v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VrtiskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.