In re B.C.

Because I do not agree that the single question asked of the juvenile by the arresting officer concerning new suspicious conduct she committed after being arrested and brought to the police station constitutes custodial interrogation within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), I would reverse the trial court’s ruling granting her motion to suppress her statement. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I.1 do not dispute the facts as recited by the majority, but add some details drawn from the testimony at the adjudicatory hearing and at the suppression hearing. Such details help…