Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 13-78, (1978)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided February 21, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

COMMITTEE ON ASSEMBLY ORGANIZATION, Legislature

You ask whether a portion of Assembly Bill 894 is constitutional.

Assembly Bill 894 provides for a state waterfowl hunting stamp costing $3 which must be purchased and affixed to a hunting license before the licensee may hunt waterfowl during the designated waterfowl hunting season. Assembly Bill 894 proposes in part as follows:

"SECTION 2. 29.102 of the statutes is created to read:
"29.102 WATERFOWL HUNTING STAMP. (1) Except as otherwise provided, no person may hunt waterfowl unless he or she has a waterfowl hunting stamp affixed by the stamp's…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API