Legal Opinion

Gist v. Stamford Hospital District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 2, 1976No. 4931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WALTER, Justice.

On July 22, 1976, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court.

B. J. Gist, Lem Ruark and Anita Harvey MacGregor filed their petition for a declaratory judgment complaining of the Stamford Hospital District and its Board of Directors, Sam Baize, A. C. Humphrey, A. J. Mills, Don Rose, Eugene Swenson, Eugene Watts, and Earl Smith, and the Attorney General of Texas seeking to have Senate Bill # 450, being Chapter 563 of the regular session of the 63rd Legislature authorizing the expansion of the Stamford Hospital District, declared null and void and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Victory v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Barnett v. MaidaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Stamford Hospital District v. VinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Carnes Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Jackson v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Armstrong v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Gordon Yates Building Supplies, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Schuster v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API