Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Greenstreet, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 15, 2001No. 1992282Published
1Opinion of the Court
806 So.2d 1203 (2001)
Ex parte GREENSTREET, INC.
(Re Nella Dean Hyde v. Checks Are Us; Cash Zone; Greenstreet, Inc.; Quick Cash, Inc.; Check Into Cash; and Bill's Pawn, Inc.)
1992282.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
June 15, 2001.
G. Bartley Loftin III and Walter A. Dodgen of Balch & Bingham, L.L.P., Huntsville, for petitioner.
Garve Ivey, Jr., of Ivey & Ragsdale, Jasper, for respondent.
STUART, Justice.
Greenstreet, Inc., is a defendant in an action filed by Nella Dean Hyde in the Walker Circuit Court. Greenstreet has filed a petition for the writ of mandamus, challenging the correctness of the trial…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Rogers Foundation Repair, Inc. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.