Legal Opinion

Binz v. Harwood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1956No. 15765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Binz J. Settegast, now deceased, executed a formal will in duplicate and had same witnessed and signed in duplicate by subscribing witnesses in the office of his attorney. Approximately one and one-half years later he died. The copy of his will which he had taken from the office of his attorney immediately after executing the same was not found among his papers, nor was it to be located up to the time of the filing of the suit from which appeal has been taken to this court. The copy of the will which was left in the office files of the attorney was the will admitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Phillips v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Country Cupboard, Inc. v. Texstar Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Pape Equipment Co. v. I.C.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Garver v. First National Bank of CanadianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Hawkins v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API