Legal Opinion

Tietke v. Union Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

On submission of this cause to the court upon stipulated facts there was a judgment against appellant for costs. The action is one to recover money paid defendant on two contracts for conveyance of certain lots, the contracts differing only as to the lots described.

These contracts were between defendant, called the “vendor” therein, and plaintiff, called the “purchaser.” They provided that if plaintiff made certain payments by instalments and performed the covenants therein provided for, “said vendor will convey, or cause to be conveyed, ”-the fee simple title to said lots.

Under a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. KastorIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Cowan v. CurranIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Atlee v. BartholomewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. ReuterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Valulis v. Phillip State Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API