Legal Opinion

Liebster v. Lucas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1923No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff sued in trespass for damages to his automobile sustained in a collision between his car and one driven by defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendant. The two assignments of error complain of the exclusion of certain evidence offered by plaintiff. We quote from the record:

By plaintiff’s counsel:

“Q. Did you have a talk with Mr. Lucas?
“A. The next day at the hearing.
“Q. Did you have any talk with him in the patrol wagon?
“A. Yes.
“By Mr. McCracken:
“Q. How long after the accident was that?
“A. About half an hour.
“Mr. McCracken: I object.
“The Court:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simons v. Vulcan Oil & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Kennedy v. ErdmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Salvitti v. ThroppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Gogel v. BlazofskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Rudisill v. CordesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API