Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Ezzard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1947No. 31710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “Any nuisance which tends to the immediate annoyance of the citizens in general, is manifestly injurious to the public health or safety, or tends greatly to corrupt the manners and morals of the people may be abated and suppressed.” Code, § 72-201. And “A public nuisance may be abated on the application of any citizen specially injured.” § 72-202. “If the nuisance complained of shall exist in a city having a population of 20,000 or more, the police court of such city, whether known as mayor’s or recorder’s court or otherwise designated, shall have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Adams v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Hendricks v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Scott v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Marietta v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Stanfield v. Glynn CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Moon v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Stringer v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Maddox v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API