Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Attardo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion for supersedeas. Petitioners, inmates at the Lexington County jail, seek to supersede an order of the Honorable Louis Rosen denying their request for release based on an application of State v. Patterson, Opinion No. 20737, S. C., 249 S. E. (2d) 770, filed August 9, 1978, to Code Section 17-23-90 (1976). We deny the motion.

Our decision in State v. Patterson, supra, wherein we held that a term of court terminates when court adjourns at the end of the week, has no application to a defendant’s right to a speedy trial as defined in Code Section 17-23-90. That provision clearly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API