Legal Opinion

United States v. Hart

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 19, 2001No. 00-0416/AFPublished

1Per curiam

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of two specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. A panel of officer members sitting as a general court-martial sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, 24 months’ confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged and the court below affirmed. We granted review of the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY' ALLOWING OPINION/REPUTATION TESTIMONY ABOUT APPELLANT’S CREDIBILITY WHEN APPELLANT…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. GoldwireCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API