Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc.

We affirm, concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for continuance, nor did it err in awarding plaintiff Miami Purveyors an attorney’s fee based on the legend, providing for same, upon the invoices which accompanied the deliveries and which were signed by some employee of the receiving restaurant.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.