Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Hanson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 13, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The question is whether the administrator pendente lite or the heirs of the decedent are entitled to surplus money arising from a mortgage foreclosure sale.

The property was owned by William Hanson, subject to a first mortgage of $7,000 and a second mortgage of $3,000, both held by the complainant William Courtney. On January 2, 1947, William Hanson and Mildred Hanson, his wife, entered into a contract with Carle H. Daube for the sale of this property to him for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. Hanson v. LevyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Righter v. First Reformed Church of BoontonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API