Legal Opinion

In Re Dabney

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1969No. Crim. 13003PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Israel Dabney petitions for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that both his conviction and his augmented penalty as a second narcotics offender were obtained by means of a constitutionally invalid prior conviction. At petitioner’s' trial the People introduced before the jury an unconstitutionally obtained prior conviction to prove his guilt by impeaching petitioner’s testimony and by demonstrating his knowledge that a packet alleged to be in his possession contained heroin. We conclude that the admission of that prior conviction was erroneous in the light of People v. Coffey (1967) 67 Cal.2d…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. TidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API