Legal Opinion

Willing v. Binenstock

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 2, 1937No. 6183PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The appellant is the receiver of a national bank. The bank held promissory notes in excess of $20,000 upon which the partners Swinger and Binenstock were jointly liable. Binenstock had in his personal deposits at the bank a sum in excess of $30,000 and Swinger had on deposit approximately $1,500. The receiver was about to sue the partners for the balance of the joint indebtedness upon the promissory notes and had indicated that he would refuse to allow the personal deposits to be set off against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Binenstock v. WillingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bohack Corp. v. Borden, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API