Legal Opinion

Patton v. Kirkman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1946No. 6857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Patton commenced this action to recover damages sustained as the result of a collision between trucks driven by himself and Chess Kirkman. A. J. Kirkman was made a defendant in the suit because he was the owner of the truck driven by and the employer of Chess Kirkman. The defendants filed an answer and counterclaim to plaintiff’s complaint in which they alleged that it was plaintiff who was negligent because he was driving at a rate that was excessive for existing conditions and because he had failed to keep a proper lookout for approaching vehicles and for the culvert and hole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Nevin Bus Line, Inc. v. Paul R. Hostetter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Dixon v. Alabam Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Piper v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parks v. Zions First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hill v. Estate of AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ratley v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Sorenson v. BeersUtah Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API