Sterler v. Busch
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, C. J.
The defendant moved for a directed verdict, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, and it was renewed attire close of all the testimony. Complaint is made that the court erred in overruling the motions. The point most f.ully argued, and apparently the one most relied upon for a reversal, is the claim that the undisputed evidence shows that plaintiff and her driver were guilty of contributory negligence. .It is also claimed that the verdict is excessive. Two or three errors are.assigned as to the admission of evidence; but as to some of these, the place where the evidence, objections, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RainsbargerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Switzer v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Brause v. BrauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Sever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Kirby v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Ritchey v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Jones v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- Spencer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Manders v. DallamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.