Time Warner, Inc. v. Gadinsky
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
It is clear that memoranda from the writer of an allegedly offending article to his superiors submitted to prepare a response to a notice served on the publication pursuant to section 770.01, Florida Statutes (1991) were created in anticipation of the litigation specifically threatened by the notice itself, and which in fact ensued thereafter in the present action for libel. The documents are therefore protected by the work product privilege. See DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. Hernandez, 638 So.2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Anchor Nat’l Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Smeltz, 546 So.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. NakutisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. SwilleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Marshall v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Anchor Nat. Fin. Serv. Inc. v. SmeltzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snyder v. Value Rent-A-CarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999