Legal Opinion

De Wolf v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1953No. A-11919PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

This is an original action in habeas corpus brought by Carl Austin DeWolf, wherein he alleges that he is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the warden of the State Penitentiary at McAlester, Oklahoma. He complains that the cause of his restraint is by reason of a certain conviction by j'ury and j'udgment and sentence entered in the district court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, on October 5, 1949, fixing his punishment at death by electrocution, in an action wherein the petitioner was charged with the murder, on August 30, 1946, of police officer, Gerald St. Clair, in Tulsa on said last…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. United States Ex Rel. Weber v. RagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. In Re Pate's PetitionCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. In Re WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API