Legal Opinion

State v. Robar

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 27, 1991No. 88-341PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

The defendant, Donald C. Robar, appeals from his conviction by jury for burglary in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1201(a), arguing that testimony from an inquest was improperly considered, the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, and the deferred sentence statute is unconstitutional. We hold that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction as a matter of law, and reverse.

I

Defendant was charged with breaking into the Fish Bank Restaurant in South Burlington in December 1985 and stealing $25 worth of beer and $100 worth of pork ribs. The charge resulted from a June…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. United States v. Gennaro J. OrricoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API