Edward Brookins and Ralph Hubert Houston, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, District Judge:
Appellants Brookins and Houston were found guilty and sentenced under Count Ten, and appellant Houston upon Counts Two, Three and Four of an indictment returned against them and other defendants, as set out below.(1) Their first specification of error alleges that, although appellants by stipulation had waived their right to attack the selection of the jury in the Albany Division of the court, such waiver was coerced by threats to transfer the cause to the Macon Division of the court.
This contention is clearly without merit. Assuming without deciding that appellants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Demos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Jewell B. Moomaw, James Edward Crittenden and Kenneth Wallace Morrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Willis Junior Liverman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos LermaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- G.H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Alberto Hernando NarvaezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Ralph Hubert Houston, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.