Legal Opinion

State v. Holtcamp

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 29, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

The defendant, Rhonda Holtcamp, was convicted of kidnapping in violation of T.C.A. § 39-2602. Her punishment was fixed at 90 days in the County Workhouse, but 60 days of this workhouse sentence were suspended by the trial judge. On this appeal, the defendant insists that the evidence does not support the jury verdict, T.C.A. § 39-2602 (1975) is unconstitutional, venue was insufficiently shown, the trial judge erred in rulings concerning the admission or exclusion of certain testimony, the District Attorney General made improper argument, the trial judge improperly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Stiller v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AddisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. State v. PenderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. State v. FluellenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. State v. LuckieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API