Lockley v. CSX Transportation Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
CSX Transportation Inc. (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Albert Lockley (“Plaintiff’) following a jury trial. We affirm.
The trial court summarized the facts and procedural history of this case as follows:
[Plaintiff,] Albert Lockley, age 53, commenced this litigation against [Appellant], pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. *387§§ 51-60, and the Federal Locomotive Inspection Act (FLIA), 49 U.S.C. § 20701 et seq.
Plaintiff alleged that [Appellant] failed to provide him with a reasonably safe place to work during 84 years of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Nickels v. Grand Trunk Western RR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Berkeyheiser v. A-Plus Investigations, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Matson v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian CharitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Blumer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.