Legal Opinion
Vagim v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1964No. Civ. 11031PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DYKE, J. †
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate. Appellants challenge the validity of proceedings taken by the Board of Supervisors of Fresno County looking toward the construction upon county-owned property within the City of Fresno of a courthouse, and of other buildings for county purposes.
Within the City of Fresno the county owns a tract of land, about 15 acres in extent, to which it acquired title in 1874. Although the deed contained a provision “to be used for the erection of a courthouse thereon, and for other County purposes” the county acquired title in fee.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Kentucky Institution for Blind v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Town of Atherton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Santa Barbara v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- City of Santa Ana v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- County of Santa Barbara v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976