Legal Opinion

Johnson v. . Murchison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The exceptions to the trial below which appear upon the record may be disposed of in the order in which they stand.

During the examination of Samuel E. Johnson as a witness on behalf of plaintiffs he was asked whether certain releases, which he had given to quality himself, were not, in truth, without any consideration. This was objected to by plaintiffs, but allowed by the court, and answered in the affirmative.

The case does not disclose for what purpose this was used in the argument, or whether it was used for any purpose. We should take it for granted, therefore, that it was applied only to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. . BowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Den on Demise of Halcombe v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  3. Stone v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API