Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haughton v. McCollum

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1988No. 87-705Published

1DissentTorbert, Chief Justice

It is undisputed that the appellees implemented the color coding plan in order to address a void that was created when the legislature authorized a presidential primary to be held approximately 90 days prior to the regular primary elections. See Code 1975, Chapter 16A of Title 17. The poll lists, provided for in Code 1975, § 17-16-14, which would identify the voters who participated in each party’s presidential primary, are to be destroyed after the time allowed by law for filing a contest to that election. Code 1975, § 17-16-25. Therefore, if a contest was filed after the regular primary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Advertiser Co. v. HobbieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Locke v. WheatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Sharrock v. KeansburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Morgan Cty. Bd. of Ed. v. Ala. Public SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Mobile Cty. Repub. Exec. Com. v. MandevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API