Legal Opinion

Durham v. Pitts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1960No. 37953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

1. Exception is taken to the judgment of the trial court in denying the defendants’ motion to enter a judgment in their favor predicated on a verdict which was returned in a previous trial of the same case at a different term and 6 months and 18 days prior to the filing of the motion. The motion is fatally defective because it affirmatively declares material developments precluding it which ensued subsequently to the particular verdict to which the motion is directed and which occurred prior to the filing of the motion. These material developments are: (1) a more recent trial; (2)…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hiscock v. HiscockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API