Legal Opinion

Leo Payne Pontiac, Inc. v. Ratliff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1972No. C-120PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

We granted certiorari in this case to consider the petitioner’s contention that the decision of the Court of Appeals in Leo Payne Pontiac, Inc. v. Ratliff, 29 Colo. App. 386, 486 P.2d 477 relating to the questions of remittitur and excessive exemplary damages is contrary to the established law of this state. The Court of Appeals ruled against the petitioner on all of his assignments of error, but Jield that the trial court was without jurisdiction to order a remittitur of $4,000 of the $7,500 exemplary damages awarded by the jury without first obtaining the consent of the plaintiff. As one of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. J. Truett Payne Company v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Kresse v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Barnes v. LehmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Clancy v. Reid-Ward Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Frick v. AbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API