Legal Opinion

Russell v. Hanan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 8, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant prays that defendant be enjoined from relying upon the statute of limitations in a pending law action. Defendant, a surgeon, operated upon complainant in April, 1927. The next morning, complainant heard him ask the nurse what had become of the drain tube or tissue which had been in the wound during the operation. She replied that she had not seen it. They immediately searched for it without success and finally the nurse said it must have gone with the bed linen. Seven years later, another surgeon found the tissue in complainant's neck. She then sued defendant for damages arising…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Partrick v. GrovesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Noel v. TeffeauNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Lamb v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Hawkins v. Public Service, C., TransportNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API