Legal Opinion

Quinones v. Ladejo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2021No. 2021-T-0003Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Quinones v. Ladejo,

2021-Ohio-1988.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY SUSAN QUINONES, AS LEGAL CASE NO. 2021-T-0003 GUARDIAN OF DAVID N. SCHEEHLE, et al., Civil Appeal from the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Court of Common Pleas -v- Trial Court No. 2020 CV 00883 OLANYANJU LADEJO, et al., Defendants, PROSERV LOGISTICS LLC, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Decided: June 14, 2021 Judgment: Reversed and remanded. Christopher J. Van Blargan, Kisling, Nestico & Redick, LLC, 3412 West Market Street, Akron, OH 44333 (For Plaintiffs-Appellants). Kurt D. Anderson…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API