Bradley v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentCarlton, J.
¶ 26. I respectfully dissent. I submit this dissent due to the following constitutional concerns in this case: (1) the violation of procedural due process by the denial of Bradley’s request for access to the State’s procedures for a psychiatric examination upon raising a reasonable question of his competency to stand trial, and (2) Bradley and his counsel presented sufficient evidence to satisfy his burden of proof to raise a reasonable question as to his legal competency to stand trial, and his ability to understand the proceedings and rationally assist in making his defense.
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Evans v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Howard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Dezso John Lokos v. Walter Capps, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.