Legal Opinion
Orman v. Keith
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 15, 1867PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Mr. S. E. Browhe, for Orman and Jewett, presented a transcript of the record and moved that the writ of error be made a supersedeas. The errors assigned referred to the evidence given at the trial below, and this evidence was contained in a bill of exceptions filed in vacation. There was no order of court authorizing the bill to be filed in vacation pursuant to the statute. 4 Sess. 92.
1Per curiam
We think that a bill of exceptions should be filed in term time unless there is an order of court allowing it to be filed in vacation. In this case there was no such order and no bill of exceptions filed in term time, and therefore we cannot notice the errors assigned. The motion for supersedeas is denied.
Motion denied.
2Cited by2 opinions
- State Bank v. PlummerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897