Legal Opinion · Dissent

Julio Cisternas-Estay and Doris Cisternas-Estay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 14, 1976No. 75--1261Published

1DissentGibbons, Circuit Judge

Although the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. (hereinafter APA), has been in effect since 1946, and the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. (hereinafter INA), since 1952, new issues occasionally arise concerning their interrelationship. The two cases sub judice squarely confront this court with an issue of first impression: does the mandatory disqualification provision of § 5(c) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 554(d),1 govern the review by the Board of Immigration Appeals (hereinafter BIA) of decisions of an immigration judge, specifically those denying…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API