Legal Opinion

Second Natl. Bank v. Hoblit

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLREAD, PJ

This finding of fact by the trial court is amply sustained by the evidence in the case. It has been uniformly held in this state that property delivered by a wife to a husband, or vice versa, can always be declared a trust in the absence of positive evidence that the property was transferred for valuable consideration, or given as a gift. Newton v Taylor, 32 Oh St 399; Bechtol v Ewing, Adm’r, 89 Oh St 53; 105 N. E. 72, L. R. A. 1917E, 279, Ann. Cas. 19150, 1183; Richards v Parsons, 7 Oh Ap 422; Stickney v Stickney, 131 U. S. 227, 9 S. Ct. 677, 33 L. Ed. 136. The following citations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stickney v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Payne v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Payne v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Flanders v. AdamsCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoerster v. Johnson City State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Wilson v. MayMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  3. French v. Blankenship (In re Blankenship)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  4. In re HouchinsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1937
  5. Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API