Legal Opinion
Sidco Industries Inc. v. Wimar Tahoe Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 25, 1991No. Civ. 91-110-FRPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, Judge:
The matter before the court is the motion (# 6) of defendants, Wimar Tahoe Corporation (Wimar) and William J. Yung, to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) on the grounds of improper venue, lack of personal jurisdiction, and insufficiency of service of process.
FACTS
This is an action for trademark infringement, alleging violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121, false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and violations of the Oregon Anti-Dilution Statute, O.R.S. 647.107. The action is brought by Sidco Industries Incorporated (Sidco), an Oregon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Magic Toyota, Inc. v. Southeast Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
- Overland, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- French Transit, Ltd. v. Modern Coupon System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Heroes, Inc. v. Heroes FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Hasbro, Inc. v. Clue Computing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.