Legal Opinion
Finlayson v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 15, 1935No. 13090PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Justice.
We had not originally intended to make an extended discussion of this appeal, but the earnest motion for rehearing has convinced us that we should withdraw our original opinion.
Appellee, by her original petition filed in 1932, alleged her ownership of an oil lease and that appellant unlawfully assigned an interest therein to the Continental Supply Company and prayed for removal of cloud from title. To this the defendants answered by general denial. Finlayson amended and added to his general denial a cross-action, alleging that he owned the lease in 1931; that legal title…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Michael v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Wylie v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Irion v. YellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Texas v. PearsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Hajdik v. Wingate, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Hall v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
- Cheney v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Marriage of Brown, Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.