Thomas v. Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.

_JjAlthough I agree with the majority’s holding that a casino qualifies as a merchant under La. R.S. 9:2800.6, I disagree with the majority’s holding that the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s (Harrah’s) motion for summary judgment. I would find that the plaintiff (Ms. Thomas) failed to establish an unreasonable risk of harm or a defect and thus affirm the trial court’s decision.

In her petition, Ms. Thomas averred that the she “tripped due to an electrical extension cord/vacuum cord,” which an employee of Harrah’s was using. In her deposition, however, Ms. Thomas testified that…