Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Whitehonse v. Harris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1915No. Appeal, No. 24PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 24, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., July T., 1914, No. 48, of ouster in case of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Ex Relatione C. A. Whitehonse, District Attorney, v. Robert H. Harris. Suggestion for writ of quo warranto.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 24, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., July T., 1914, No. 48, of ouster in case of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Ex Relatione C. A. Whitehonse, District Attorney, v. Robert H. Harris. Suggestion for writ of quo warranto. The following opinion was filed by ICooh, J.: The pleadings show that the defendant is the chief burgess of the Borough of Tamaqua and is an employee of the estate of Robert Harris, deceased, which is engaged in said borough in the business of job printing and publishing a newspaper known as the Evening Courier. The borough…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment of ouster in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below directing it to be entered.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Likovich AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. In Re Appeal From the Report of Township AuditorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Webber v. Midway BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Boyle v. Jakomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API