Legal Opinion
M.P.G. Construction, Inc. v. Department of Transportation & Development
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 2004No. 2003 CA 0164PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J^PETTIGREW, J.
Unsuccessful bidder on highway construction project brought action against the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (“DOTD”), seeking to enjoin the award of the contract. After writs were exhausted, successful bidder intervened and joined DOTD’s reconventional demand for damages against unsuccessful bidder for delay of the project. Cross motions for summary judgment were filed by both sides. The trial court granted summary judgment and dismissed DOTD and inter-venor’s claims for damages, attorney fees, and costs. From this judgment, DOTD…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Robles v. ExxonMobileLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Johnson v. Evan Hall Sugar Co-Op., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Foreman v. DANOS AND CUROLE MARINE CONT.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- L & a CONTRACTING v. Ram Indus. Coatings, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibson & Associates, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIALLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Gibson & Associates, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Love v. AAA Temporaries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gibson & Associates, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.