Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, dated June 26,1875, for $1,000, payable to the plaintiff on demand, and purporting to be signed by the defendant’s intestate by her mark, in the presence of an attesting witness. The defence is that the note was not made by the intestate. On this issue the defendant was allowed to put in evidence tending to show that the plaintiff was not a person of means; that his real estate was mortgaged for its full value; that he was a frequent borrower of money in small sums, and at one time was refused a loan of $900, because he had no security to offer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Costello v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Winchester v. CharterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Sweetser v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Higgins v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chandler v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Interstate Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Coleman v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Worthington v. Plymouth County RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API