Esteban v. Esteban
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The husband challenges various aspects of the parties’ final judgment of dissolution. We find error in the following particulars:
1. The amounts required for alimony and child support are substantially beyond the ability of the husband to pay and therefore must be decreased. Suarez v. Suarez, 514 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), pet. for review dismissed, 399 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1981); Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Consistent with the facts that both parties have an equal interest in the family home,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blum v. BlumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Hendricks v. HendricksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Farrington v. FarringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Marriage of Frederiksen v. FrederiksenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Waskin v. WaskinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.