State v. Coco
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant, F. C. Coco, was charged by affidavit before the city court of the city of Alexandria with violating Act No. 39 of the Extra Session of "the Legislature of 1921, known as the “Hood Bill.” The pertinent part of the affidavit is as follows:
“That said F. C. Coco,, unlawfully, maliciously, and feloniously did possess intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, contrary to the statute 'of the State of Louisiana and against the peace and dignity of the same.”
The defendant was tried, found guilty, and. sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and costs, and to serve 60 days in the parish jail,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Grinage v. Times-Democrat Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Gruner v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. ViatorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Vander Sluys v. FinfrockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. YokumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Jackson v. CoxeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.