Winborne, Utilities Comr. v. . Browning
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdisN, J.
Do sections 2613(h) and 2613(1), Michie’s Code of 1931, or section 7880(96), apply to the business carried on by the respondent ?
The identical question involved in this appeal has been considered in Winborne, Utilities Comr., v. Mackey, ante, 554. All the evidence offered at the hearing tended to show that the respondent operated motor vehicles, transporting passengers and property for compensation, and as a business between cities and towns along Highway No. 10. Consequently he is not protected by section 7880(96), as heretofore pointed out in the Maclcey case. However, the evidence also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Searight v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Pakas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- City Coach Co. v. Gastonia Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947