Legal Opinion
Knepka v. Tallman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in resolving issues of credibility in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Mickelson v Babcock, 190 AD2d 1037; see generally, Black v Chittenden, 69 NY2d 665, 669; Capelin Assocs. v Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 NY2d 338, 341). Any inconsistencies between the deposition testimony of plaintiffs and their affidavits submitted in opposition to the motion present credibility issues for trial (see, Schoen v Rochester Gas & Elec., 242 AD2d 928;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Black v. ChittendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mickelson v. BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Schoen v. Rochester Gas & Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dietzen v. Aldi Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Zbock v. GietzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Palmer v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kellogg v. Office of the Chief Medical ExaminerNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Mejia v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.